From traditional TV bulletins to real-time updates on digital platforms, there is a huge shift in the dissemination of news. So how have our consumption habits changed over the years? We asked Parleen Gill about it.

“Earlier, we had very limited sources, maybe one or two newspapers and Doordarshan. Naturally, we consumed whatever was presented to us without questioning much, because there weren’t many alternatives. Today, the landscape has completely changed. We have multiple platforms and sources, which gives us the ability to cross-check information and choose what kind of news we want to consume. That freedom is powerful. So from that perspective, I believe things are better now, provided we use this access wisely.”

Parleen also shares how the shift from scheduled news to on-demand content has made audiences more informed or more overwhelmed. He adds, “People are definitely more informed today because information is available instantly. But at the same time, there’s a sense of overload. If someone isn’t aware that not all platforms present completely accurate or unbiased information, they can easily get misled. So while access has increased awareness, it has also increased confusion. The responsibility now lies more with the audience to filter what they consume.”

With the rise of social media and apps like X, formerly Twitter, one has to be extremely careful about the authenticity of news. On this, Parleen says,
“I prefer to do my own research. For example, if the topic is related to space or science, I would rather check official government or institutional handles instead of relying only on news channels. I believe going to the source is always the safest way. It takes a little more effort, but it gives you clarity and confidence about what you’re consuming.”

Earlier, news was seen as formal and authoritative; today it is faster and more opinion-driven. Parleen thinks it has both positives and negatives. He says, “On the positive side, people now have a voice. Through social media, we can question authorities and express opinions openly, something that wasn’t as accessible earlier.

However, the downside is that news has become heavily opinion-driven. Ideally, news should remain neutral and factual, allowing the audience to form their own opinions. Unfortunately, that balance is often missing today.”

But do you miss the credibility and depth of traditional news formats? Do you prefer the speed and accessibility of modern platforms? He laughs, “Do I really have a choice? I’ve learned to accept things as they are. Every era has its pros and cons. Instead of resisting it, I prefer adapting to it this way so it doesn’t affect my peace of mind. I consciously limit my news consumption to about 10 to 15 minutes a day, just enough to stay updated.”

“I’m very mindful of what I consume digitally and try to keep my algorithm healthy. I’m aware of how harmful constant scrolling can be, not just mentally but emotionally as well. So for me, balance comes from discipline and awareness.”